西九龍裁判法院法官陳仲衡對佔領運動者的判詞，連篇累牘，我沒有細看，但讀其為警察發射催淚彈辯護之詞，卻見到以下一句：When D1 called for the over-cramming of Admiralty first, and then over-cramming of Central on 27 September, he must had in mind a number of turnout which would be enough to over-cram Admiralty and Central（第一被告九月二十七日號召人群先堵塞金鐘，再堵塞中環，當時他一定認為有足夠人數堵塞兩地）。這一句根本不能算是英文。
按must之後，須用原形動詞（infinitive），例如He must have gone（他一定已經去了），不可說He must had gone。陳仲衡所謂he must had in mind，必須改為he must have had in mind。
又a number of是「不少」或「若干」的意思，其後須用複數名詞，例如a number of people（不少人）。但turnout是單數名詞，指「到場人數」；a number of turnout這說法，殆不可解，勉強翻譯，應是「很多到場人數」，而a number of turnout（which would be）enough to似是英文字寫的中文，即「很多到場人數，足以……」正式英文說法則應是a turnout（which would be）large enough to等等。
文法錯誤之外，原句重複使用over-cramming、Admiralty、Central等字，十分累贅，宜改寫如下：When D1 called for the over-cramming first of Admiralty and then of Central on 27 September, he must have had in mind a turnout large enough to over-cram the two places。